U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

STEP 2
Describe the Program

cycle graphic step 2 Describe the Program highlighted
cycle graphic step 2 Describe the Program highlighted

CDC framework for evaluation steps cycle graphic represents the steps and standards. The standards are utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The steps are "Engage Stakeholders", "Describe the Program", "Focus Evaluation Design", "Gather Credible Evidence", "Justify conclusions", and "Use and Share Lessons Learned". "Use and Share Lessons Learned" is highligted in the graphic.

To evaluate your program, you first must have a clear understanding of the program and its underlying logic.

This step is critical to the evaluation as it provides clarity on what you are evaluating as well as consensus among stakeholders around the definition of “success” for the program.

Develop a Logic Model

A logic model is a visual communication tool that explains your internal program logic—underlying theory or set of assumptions about why the program will work or why it is a good solution to address the need or identified problem. It provides an easy way for someone who does not know your program to get a sense of what the program will do, what it is going to accomplish, and how the activities will bring about the changes and expected results. Understanding essential elements helps you define how an approach is intended to influence risk and protective factors and violence outcomes.

external icon
team meeting around the table

Logic Model

Logic models typically have the following components:

Hover over the boxes below to reveal descriptions of the logic model components.

Problem or Need

line connecting boxes

Inputs or Resources

arrow pointing right

Activites

arrow pointing right

Outputs

arrow pointing right

Outcomes

Share, immediate, and Long term effects

arrow pointing up

Assumptions or Context

Problem or Need

arrow pointing right
arrow pointing right
arrow pointing right
Inputs or Resources
Activites
Outputs
Outcomes
line connecting boxes

Assumptions or Context





There is no one way to develop a logic model. Many processes (e.g., outcomes mapping, if-then chains) exist to help you work with your team and stakeholders. For multi-component programs or initiatives, you may decide to develop multiple logic models with varying levels of detail. Keep in mind that as the program evolves, you may want to revisit your logic model and/or description of your program to ensure they are still accurate.

tools icon

For more information about how to develop a logic model and a fillable logic model template, download the Developing a Logic Model worksheet.

team members reviewing work

Clearly Define Outcomes

Clear and specific outcomes define what the program hopes to accomplish. Well-defined outcomes help you identify and select indicators to measure and track the outcomes.

Outcomes usually fall into these common categories.

changes in learning icon

Changes in learning (e.g., knowledge, attitudes, awareness, opinions, motivations, aspirations, skills)

changes in conditions icon

Changes in conditions or status as a result of actions (e.g., social, economic, civic, health, environmental)

changes in actions icon

Changes in actions (e.g., behavior, procedures, practice, policy, decisions, social actions)

The sequence and timeframe in which you can observe changes in these outcomes depend on the types of prevention approaches.

tip sheet icon

For more information about defining your outcomes, download the Identifying Outcomes tip sheet.

Considerations when Describing Your Program

In relation to the Evaluation Framework Standards, ask yourself the following questions:

Utility icon

Utility

Is level of detail of the program description appropriate? Is it clear to someone unfamiliar with the program?

Feasibility icon

Feasibility

Does the program description and logic model include activities and outcomes that are realistic and within the sphere of influence of the program?

Propriety icon

Propriety

Is the program description complete enough to examine all aspects of the program, including strengths, weaknesses, unintended consequences, and intended outcomes?

Accuracy icon

Accuracy

Is the program description relevant to the context and appropriate for its current stage of development or implementation?

external icon

CDC Framework for Evaluation Steps

Click on a step below to discover more.

Step 1 Engage Stakeholders
Step 2 Describe the Program
Step 3 Focus Evaluation Design

NEXT STEP

Step 4 Gather Credible Evidence
Step 5 Justify conclusions
Step 6 Use and Share Lessons Learned